[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1345210884.27859.90.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:41:24 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: nyoushchenko@...sta.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
Heinz.Egger@...utronix.de, thomas.wucher@...utronix.de,
shmulik.ladkani@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
tim.bird@...sony.com, Marius.Mazarel@...l.ro
Subject: Re: UBI fastmap updates
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:33 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:11:55 +0300
> schrieb Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>:
> > We do not do anything like this in UBI because UBI does not need this,
> > it does not have any complex data structures on the media.
> >
> > With fastmap - I am unsure. I think it is not a problem, because
> > probably you never append more data, you just re-write everything,
> > right?
>
> Yep, the on-flash fastmap is immutable.
Here the question is - if you have PEB containing fastmap data,
half-filled. Will you ever add more data there to the empty space in the
PEB or not?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists