[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1345222691.16533.7.camel@oc3660625478.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:58:11 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
vivek@...ibm.com, sri@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] sched: Add a new API to find the prefer idlest
cpu
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 18:48 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 08:39 -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
>
> > Hello Ingo, Peter,
> > Have you had chance to review below patch?
>
> Well no of course not, nobody CC'ed us..
>
> Your patch submission sucks, you split the changelog and the actual
> patch into two different emails.
>
> It doesn't mention who would be calling this and how often. Nor does
> it
> seem to explain where the cpumask arguments come from.
>
> Please try again.
Thanks for your comments. I must be spoiled by net-dev maintainers. I
used to submit the patch this way thought my linux email in the past
many years. So I need to reply on the changelog for the actual patch? I
hope I won't make any more suck submissions again.
I will try to explain more details why this API needs to be exported.
Thanks again.
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists