linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/31] arm64: Kernel booting and initialisation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1208171407540.1541@xanadu.home>
Date:	Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:21:24 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/31] arm64: Kernel booting and initialisation

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Thursday 16 August 2012, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Some people will want to use bzip2 or whatever other decompressor du 
> > jour.  Maybe this shouldn't be gzip specific, or just presented as a 
> > possible option?
> 
> Good point. Whether this should be part of this document depends on
> what assumptions we make about the boot loader getting the image
> in the first place.
> 
> In the strict sense, we are documenting the interface between the boot
> loader and the kernel here, which already specifies that  the kernel
> must be uncompressed by the time we enter it. If the boot loader wants
> to add its own encryption or compression methods, or its own headers
> in front of the binary, the boot protocol isn't really impacted.

Right.  And someone else will insist on wrapping the kernel into a boot 
loader specific image format e.g. u-Boot.  If all those variations could 
be kept out of the kernel build that would be a good thing.

That means the kernel should be wrapped/compressed/scrambled at 
installation time, not at build time.  This way the kernel image remains 
universal and flexibility in its installation is possible.

> That said, I think it's a good idea to also specify what kind of 
> format we want to be used, e.g. a stripped ELF Image compressed with 
> one of gzip/bzip2/lzo/xz and with no other headers added, on a 
> vfat/ext4/btrfs formatted file system. There are probably a lot of 
> other things one might want to specify if we go down this route. Or we 
> could refer to the UEFI spec and mandate that the same format that 
> UEFI uses should be used here independent of what boot loader is used. 
> I think we can still allow other ways to get to the image for deeply 
> embedded systems, e.g. linking the kernel into the boot loader as a 
> blob on tightly constrained systems. For that case, we'd only specify 
> the interface between boot loader and kernel as described above.

I don't think we'll have to concern ourselves with tightly constrained 
systems that much on ARM64.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/