[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <502E9604.4010701@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:05:40 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: sameo@...ux.intel.com, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
lrg@...mlogic.co.uk
CC: Bill Huang <bilhuang@...dia.com>, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, rob@...dley.net, ldewangan@...dia.com,
thierry.reding@...onic-design.de, xxie@...dia.com,
jhovold@...il.com, kyle.manna@...l7.com, rklein@...dia.com,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: dt: tps6586x: Add power off control
On 08/17/2012 03:16 AM, Bill Huang wrote:
> Add DT property "ti,system-power-controller" telling whether or not this
> pmic is in charge of controlling the system power, so the power off
> routine can be hooked up to system call "pm_power_off".
>
> Based on the work by:
> Dan Willemsen <dwillemsen@...dia.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Huang <bilhuang@...dia.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Note that this conflicts (only context in tps6586x.txt I think) with
commit b93fffb "regulator: tps6586x: add support for SYS rail" in the
regulator tree. Also note that the patch is based on linux-next, which
contains a mis-merge of tps6586x.txt from the regulator tree. In other
words, expect some slight conflicts when you apply this. Taking it
through the regulator tree would eliminate them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists