[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A5ED84D3BB3A384992CBB9C77DEDA4D413800155@USINDEM103.corp.hds.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 21:15:56 +0000
From: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>
To: Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luck, Tony (tony.luck@...el.com)" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Matthew Garrett (mjg@...hat.com)" <mjg@...hat.com>,
"dzickus@...hat.com" <dzickus@...hat.com>,
"dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>
Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] efi_pstore: Introducing workqueue updating
sysfs entries
> I'm not a fan of creating a periodic timer that wakes up here to check for an event that should be considered very rare.
>
> Can this just become scheduled work? Scheduling work itself is a very lightweight process and should be relatively safe to do from a
> pstore write.
I agree that the periodic timer is heavy a bit.
But I would like to keep a write callback simple as much as possible in panic situation.
For example, I'm concerned that efi_pstore hangs up due to some spin_locks related workqueue like gcwq->lock.
Also, a situation which this workqueue is needed is just oops case because, system will be down and users can't access to sysfs files
in other cases, panic, reboot and emergency_restart.
So, Can I call schedule_work in oops case only as follows?
efi_pstore_write()
{
<write log to NVRAM>
if (reason != KMSG_DUMP_OOPS)
return;
schedule_work()
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists