[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120818045908.GA7503@localhost>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:59:08 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lockdep warning on rt_mutex_lock()
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 07:44:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:02:40PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:43:28AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:06:35PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > FYI, a lockdep warning:
> > >
> > > Certainly looks problematic!
> > >
> > > Any hint as to what version of the kernel produced this splat?
> > > (Yes, lazy of me to ask, I know, but I am not seeing it in my testing.)
> >
> > It happens on both 3.5.0 and 3.6-rc1. Will bisect (try older kernels) help?
> > Bisect is handy for me :)
>
> Bisection would be very welcome!!! ;-)
The bisect result is...
commit 9e571a82f0cb205a65a0ea41657f19f22b7fabb8
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Date: Thu Sep 30 21:26:52 2010 -0700
rcu: add tracing for TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
Add tracing for the tiny RCU implementations, including statistics on
boosting in the case of TINY_PREEMPT_RCU and RCU_BOOST.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists