| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1345337550-24304-15-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 02:52:27 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: tj@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...e.hu, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, ericvh@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
josh@...htriplett.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, axboe@...nel.dk, agk@...hat.com,
dm-devel@...hat.com, neilb@...e.de, ccaulfie@...hat.com,
teigland@...hat.com, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
bfields@...ldses.org, fweisbec@...il.com, jesse@...ira.com,
venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com, ejt@...hat.com,
snitzer@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
dev@...nvswitch.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com, lw@...fujitsu.com,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/16] lockd: use new hashtable implementation
Switch lockd to use the new hashtable implementation. This reduces the amount of
generic unrelated code in lockd.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
---
fs/lockd/svcsubs.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c b/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c
index 0deb5f6..d223a1f 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/lockd/share.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mount.h>
+#include <linux/hashtable.h>
#define NLMDBG_FACILITY NLMDBG_SVCSUBS
@@ -28,8 +29,7 @@
* Global file hash table
*/
#define FILE_HASH_BITS 7
-#define FILE_NRHASH (1<<FILE_HASH_BITS)
-static struct hlist_head nlm_files[FILE_NRHASH];
+static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(nlm_files, FILE_HASH_BITS);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(nlm_file_mutex);
#ifdef NFSD_DEBUG
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static inline unsigned int file_hash(struct nfs_fh *f)
int i;
for (i=0; i<NFS2_FHSIZE;i++)
tmp += f->data[i];
- return tmp & (FILE_NRHASH - 1);
+ return tmp;
}
/*
@@ -86,17 +86,17 @@ nlm_lookup_file(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file **result,
{
struct hlist_node *pos;
struct nlm_file *file;
- unsigned int hash;
+ unsigned int key;
__be32 nfserr;
nlm_debug_print_fh("nlm_lookup_file", f);
- hash = file_hash(f);
+ key = file_hash(f);
/* Lock file table */
mutex_lock(&nlm_file_mutex);
- hlist_for_each_entry(file, pos, &nlm_files[hash], f_list)
+ hash_for_each_possible(nlm_files, file, pos, f_list, file_hash(f))
if (!nfs_compare_fh(&file->f_handle, f))
goto found;
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ nlm_lookup_file(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file **result,
goto out_free;
}
- hlist_add_head(&file->f_list, &nlm_files[hash]);
+ hash_add(nlm_files, &file->f_list, key);
found:
dprintk("lockd: found file %p (count %d)\n", file, file->f_count);
@@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ static inline void
nlm_delete_file(struct nlm_file *file)
{
nlm_debug_print_file("closing file", file);
- if (!hlist_unhashed(&file->f_list)) {
- hlist_del(&file->f_list);
+ if (hash_hashed(&file->f_list)) {
+ hash_del(&file->f_list);
nlmsvc_ops->fclose(file->f_file);
kfree(file);
} else {
@@ -253,27 +253,25 @@ nlm_traverse_files(void *data, nlm_host_match_fn_t match,
int i, ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&nlm_file_mutex);
- for (i = 0; i < FILE_NRHASH; i++) {
- hlist_for_each_entry_safe(file, pos, next, &nlm_files[i], f_list) {
- if (is_failover_file && !is_failover_file(data, file))
- continue;
- file->f_count++;
- mutex_unlock(&nlm_file_mutex);
-
- /* Traverse locks, blocks and shares of this file
- * and update file->f_locks count */
- if (nlm_inspect_file(data, file, match))
- ret = 1;
-
- mutex_lock(&nlm_file_mutex);
- file->f_count--;
- /* No more references to this file. Let go of it. */
- if (list_empty(&file->f_blocks) && !file->f_locks
- && !file->f_shares && !file->f_count) {
- hlist_del(&file->f_list);
- nlmsvc_ops->fclose(file->f_file);
- kfree(file);
- }
+ hash_for_each_safe(nlm_files, i, pos, next, file, f_list) {
+ if (is_failover_file && !is_failover_file(data, file))
+ continue;
+ file->f_count++;
+ mutex_unlock(&nlm_file_mutex);
+
+ /* Traverse locks, blocks and shares of this file
+ * and update file->f_locks count */
+ if (nlm_inspect_file(data, file, match))
+ ret = 1;
+
+ mutex_lock(&nlm_file_mutex);
+ file->f_count--;
+ /* No more references to this file. Let go of it. */
+ if (list_empty(&file->f_blocks) && !file->f_locks
+ && !file->f_shares && !file->f_count) {
+ hash_del(&file->f_list);
+ nlmsvc_ops->fclose(file->f_file);
+ kfree(file);
}
}
mutex_unlock(&nlm_file_mutex);
@@ -451,3 +449,11 @@ nlmsvc_unlock_all_by_ip(struct sockaddr *server_addr)
return ret ? -EIO : 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nlmsvc_unlock_all_by_ip);
+
+static int __init nlm_init(void)
+{
+ hash_init(nlm_files);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+module_init(nlm_init);
--
1.7.8.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists