lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:28:05 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...e.com>
To:	<andi@...stfloor.org>, <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	<x86@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	<linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/74] x86, lto: Disable fancy hweight
 optimizations for LTO

>>> Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> 08/19/12 4:58 AM >>>
>--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>@@ -224,8 +224,9 @@ config X86_32_LAZY_GS
 >
>config ARCH_HWEIGHT_CFLAGS
>    string
>-    default "-fcall-saved-ecx -fcall-saved-edx" if X86_32
>-    default "-fcall-saved-rdi -fcall-saved-rsi -fcall-saved-rdx -fcall-saved-rcx -fcall-saved-r8 -fcall-saved-r9 -fcall-saved-r10 -fcall-saved-r11" if X86_64
>+    default "-fcall-saved-ecx -fcall-saved-edx" if X86_32 && !LTO
>+    default "-fcall-saved-rdi -fcall-saved-rsi -fcall-saved-rdx -fcall-saved-rcx -fcall-saved-r8 -fcall-saved-r9 -fcall-saved-r10 -fcall-saved-r11" if X86_64 && !LTO
>+    default "" if LTO
 
By moving this last line first you can avoid modifying the other two lines.

>--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/arch_hweight.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/arch_hweight.h
>@@ -25,9 +25,14 @@ static inline unsigned int __arch_hweight32(unsigned int w)
>{
>    unsigned int res = 0;
 >
>+#ifdef CONFIG_LTO
>+    res  = __sw_hweight32(w);
>+#else
>+
>    asm (ALTERNATIVE("call __sw_hweight32", POPCNT32, X86_FEATURE_POPCNT)
>             : "="REG_OUT (res)
>             : REG_IN (w));
>+#endif
 
Isn't this a little to harsh? Rather than not using popcnt at all, why don't you just add
the necessary clobbers to the asm() in the LTO case?

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ