lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120819120804.15c33931@pixies.home.jungo.com>
Date:	Sun, 19 Aug 2012 12:08:04 +0300
From:	Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
To:	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Cc:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] UBI: check max_beb_per1024 value in
 ubi_attach_mtd_dev

Hi Richard,

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:35:21 +0200 Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com> wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * A value of 0 is forced to the default value to keep the same
> +	 * behavior between ubiattach command and module parameter
> +	 */

Minor thing.

Since the module parameter is not yet introduced (only in a later
patch), and since last part of sentence isn't that important, I would
simply state:

+	 * Use the default if max_beb_per1024 isn't provided.

or alike.

Regards,
Shmulik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ