linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: Introducing Lanyard Filesystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 19 Aug 2012 12:14:22 +0200
From:	Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
To:	Dan Luedtke <mail@...rl.de>
CC:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Introducing Lanyard Filesystem

Il 19/08/2012 12:12, Dan Luedtke ha scritto:
> (resent)
> On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 00:16 +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>> What are the use cases of this filesystem?
>> It looks very minimal without much features.
> That's the feature, actually. Think of the Arduino platform or other embedded devices (TV, Car Entertainment) that just want to read/play files. You're right, no big features, but that's by design.
>
> Dan
>

You say that you wrote a new fs because of some lacks in the other fs 
("...I kind of invented a very simple filesystem that solves the issues 
I had with other filesystems...."). I read the website (very quickly 
actually) but I didn't find the point: what are pros and cons of this fs 
compared with existing fs? What problems does it solve?

Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/