linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: Introducing Lanyard Filesystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 19 Aug 2012 17:45:15 +0200
From:	Dan Luedtke <mail@...rl.de>
To:	Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lanyfs@...relist.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Introducing Lanyard Filesystem

On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 15:25 +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> Ok, I try to do a summary. You are trying to write a new general and 
> minimal fs for mobile storage device, minimal enough to be easy ported 
> on several fs. So at the end you are trying to replace the solution is 
> used today on many platforms (fat32). Without other consideration about 
> "no-feature is a feature", it seems to me really challenging because the 
> project can fail its goal no because there is design problem, bugs and 
> so on but because of limited use. We are talking about interoperability 
> problem, and we really know some companies out there from this point of 
> view :)
You nailed it and you made me feel like Don Quijote.
I'd like to give it a try anyway.

regards,
Dan

-- 
Dan Luedtke
http://www.danrl.de

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/