[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120819150951.GR11413@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 17:09:52 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, mmarek@...e.cz, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
JBeulich@...e.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 37/74] lto, KVM: Don't assume asm statements end up in the same assembler file
> The reason we use a local label is so that we the function isn't split
> into two from the profiler's point of view. See cd2276a795b013d1.
Hmm that commit message is not very enlightening.
The goal was to force a compiler error?
With LTO there is no way to force two functions be in the same assembler
file. The partitioner is always allowed to split.
>
> One way to fix this is to have a .data variable initialized to point to
> .Lkvm_vmx_return (this can be done from the same asm statement in
> vmx_vcpu_run), and reference that variable in
> vmx_set_constant_host_state(). If no one comes up with a better idea,
> I'll write a patch doing this.
I'm not clear how that is better than my patch.
-andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists