[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1345404079.1930.7.camel@kyv>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 22:21:19 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Cc: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] arm: sam9_l9260_defconfig: adjust UBI bad
eraseblocks limit
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 16:35 +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/sam9_l9260_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/sam9_l9260_defconfig
> index da276f9..d11fea5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/sam9_l9260_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/sam9_l9260_defconfig
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ CONFIG_MTD_NAND=y
> CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ATMEL=y
> CONFIG_MTD_NAND_PLATFORM=y
> CONFIG_MTD_UBI=y
> -CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT=3
> +CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT=30
I'll just remove this from from the defconfig and make it use the
default, which is more sensible for this device, as your research
showed.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists