lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120820035458.292084336@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:56:03 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
	Yang Guang <guang.a.yang@...el.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: [ 04/16] drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>

commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 upstream.

We may only start to set up the new register values after having
confirmed that the ring is truely off. Otherwise the hw might lose the
newly written register values. This is caught later on in the init
sequence, when we check whether the register writes have stuck.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50522
Tested-by: Yang Guang <guang.a.yang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -150,8 +150,6 @@ static int init_ring_common(struct intel
 	I915_WRITE_HEAD(ring, 0);
 	ring->write_tail(ring, 0);
 
-	/* Initialize the ring. */
-	I915_WRITE_START(ring, obj->gtt_offset);
 	head = I915_READ_HEAD(ring) & HEAD_ADDR;
 
 	/* G45 ring initialization fails to reset head to zero */
@@ -177,6 +175,11 @@ static int init_ring_common(struct intel
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* Initialize the ring. This must happen _after_ we've cleared the ring
+	 * registers with the above sequence (the readback of the HEAD registers
+	 * also enforces ordering), otherwise the hw might lose the new ring
+	 * register values. */
+	I915_WRITE_START(ring, obj->gtt_offset);
 	I915_WRITE_CTL(ring,
 			((ring->size - PAGE_SIZE) & RING_NR_PAGES)
 			| RING_REPORT_64K | RING_VALID);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ