linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] fat: fix ESTALE errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKYAXd-5tdajYgGGm=5y0D8fLNLXwJUmV0Vr8uAkj-xK97egOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:21:00 +0900
From:	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] fat: fix ESTALE errors

2012/8/18, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 05:41:39AM -0400, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
>>
>> This patch-set eliminates the client side ESTALE errors when
>> a FAT partition exported over NFS has its dentries evicted
>> from the cache.
>>
>> One of the reasons for this error is lack of permanent inode
>> numbers on FAT which makes it difficult to construct persistent
>> file handles.This can be overcome by using the on-disk location
>> of the directory entries (i_pos) as the inode number.
>
> The hell it can.  You've just made them unstable on rename(2).
Hello. Al.
I will check rename(2) case.
Thanks for reply.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/