linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] UBI: check max_beb_per1024 value in ubi_attach_mtd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACQ1gAgLirwiwiUOoL7ig7R_RpB8xDr2-g2gVOEUZNvAHB60pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:31:39 +0200
From:	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
To:	Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Cc:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] UBI: check max_beb_per1024 value in ubi_attach_mtd_dev

Hi Shmulik,

2012/8/19 Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:35:21 +0200 Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com> wrote:
>> +     /*
>> +      * A value of 0 is forced to the default value to keep the same
>> +      * behavior between ubiattach command and module parameter
>> +      */
>
> Minor thing.
>
> Since the module parameter is not yet introduced (only in a later
> patch), and since last part of sentence isn't that important, I would
> simply state:
>
> +        * Use the default if max_beb_per1024 isn't provided.
>
That's right, I'll correct that in next version.
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/