linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/10] fix error return code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1208201115050.1922@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:15:53 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
cc:	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/10] fix error return code

On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Takashi Iwai wrote:

> At Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:02:51 +0200,
> Julia Lawall wrote:
>>
>> These patches fix cases where the return code appears to be unintentially
>> nonnegative.
>
> The patch 10/10 seems missing.  Or are all 9 patches?  The patch
> number suddenly changes to X/9 from 4.
>
> In anyway, the patches 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are applied.
> I leave patches 1, 2 and 4 to Mark.

Sorry, I thought I fixed that, but I guess not enough.  Patches 4 and 5 
were the same originally.  There is no patch 10.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/