[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1345456601.3088.40.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:56:41 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mk@....su,
Marko Kohtala <marko.kohtala@...il.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: efi: Turn off efi_enabled after setup on mixed
fw/kernel
On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 14:48 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> When 32-bit EFI is used with 64-bit kernel (or vice versa), turn off
> efi_enabled once setup is done. Beyond setup, it is normally used to
> determine if runtime services are available and we will have none.
>
> This will resolve issues stemming from efivars modprobe panicking on a
> 32/64-bit setup, as well as some reboot issues on similar setups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> Cc: stable@...nel.org # 3.4 and 3.5
> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index f4b9b80..dad38ac 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1034,6 +1034,17 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> mcheck_init();
>
> arch_init_ideal_nops();
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> + /* Once setup is done above, disable efi_enabled on mismatched
> + * firmware/kernel archtectures since there is no support for
> + * runtime services.
> + */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) ^ efi_64bit) {
> + pr_info("efi: Setup done, disabling due to 32/64-bit mismatch\n");
> + efi_enabled = 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> }
Is there a reason we can't just disable efi_enabled at the end of
efi_init() if we're non-native, rather than having this chunk of code
here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists