linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 06/11] xen/mmu: For 64-bit do not call xen_map_identity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:06:49 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 06/11] xen/mmu: For 64-bit do not call
 xen_map_identity_early

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:58:37PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 12:45 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:41:23PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > > > B/c we do not need it. During the startup the Xen provides
> > > > > > us with all the memory mapped that we need to function.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Shouldn't we check to make sure that is actually true (I am thinking at
> > > > > nr_pt_frames)?
> > > > 
> > > > I was looking at the source code (hypervisor) to figure it out and
> > > > that is certainly true.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Or is it actually stated somewhere in the Xen headers?
> > > > 
> > > > Couldn't find it, but after looking so long at the source code
> > > > I didn't even bother looking for it.
> > > > 
> > > > Thought to be honest - I only looked at how the 64-bit pagetables
> > > > were set up, so I didn't dare to touch the 32-bit. Hence the #ifdef
> > > 
> > > I think that we need to involve some Xen maintainers and get this
> > > written down somewhere in the public headers, otherwise we have no
> > > guarantees that it is going to stay as it is in the next Xen versions.
> > > 
> > > Maybe we just need to add a couple of lines of comment to
> > > xen/include/public/xen.h.
> > 
> > The start of day memory layout for PV guests is written down in the
> > comment just before struct start_info at
> > http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/hypercall/include,public,xen.h.html#Struct_start_info
> > 
> > (I haven't read this thread to determine if what is documented matches
> > what you guys are talking about relying on)
> 
> but it is not written down how much physical memory is going to be
> mapped in the bootstrap page tables.

Considering that only pvops kernel has this change I think we are ok?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@...ts.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/