[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1345465225.23018.39.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:20:25 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
dhowells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: lockdep trace from posix timers
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 08:19 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > > + for (;;) {
> > > + if (entry == &dead)
>
> But your compiler likes "entry == &dead"? ;-)
>
Yes, fancy as GCC is these days, it doesn't quite bother with the
meta-physical questions just yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists