linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3]: ezusb cleanup, FX2 support, firmware downloading support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120820144937.GB27266@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:49:37 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Rene Buergel <rene.buergel@...ard.de>
Cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]: ezusb cleanup, FX2 support, firmware downloading
 support

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:52:56AM +0200, Rene Buergel wrote:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 05:06:27PM +0200, René Bürgel wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > this is a patches-series for controllers using the ezusb-functions.
> > > 
> > > ezusb:  remove dependency to usb_serial interface
> > > euzsb: add support for Cypress FX2LP
> > > ezusb: add functions for firmware download
> > 
> > Nice series, but your patches are white-space damaged, and I can't
> > apply
> > them at all.
> > 
> > Also, your third patch has the wrong Subject: line 
> > 
> > Care to resend them in a format that I can apply them in?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> Thanks for reviewing it. 
> 
> I will check my email-settings and resend the patches.
> 
> I'm sorry about the wrong Subject line, this will be corrected when resending.
> 
> I got some further questions: 
> - Although i removed the dependency from ezusb to usb_serial,
>   ezusb.c still resides in drivers/usb/serial.
>   Can you give me a hint, where to put it instead?
>   I would like to do that with an additional patch.

Why do you want to move it?

> - is it fine to base the soon-to-be-resent patches on 3.6-rc2?

You should redo them against the linux-next tree, which has many more
patches than 3.6-rc2.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/