[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120820155633.GF11013@thinkpad-t410>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:56:33 -0500
From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Heider <andreas@...tr.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] drm/pci: Defer initialization of secondary
graphics devices until switcheroo is ready
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:36:40PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:31:04AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * For secondary graphics devices shouldn't be initialized
> > + * until the handler and primary graphics device have been
> > + * registered with vga_switcheroo.
> > + *
> > + * FIXME: Is vga_default_device() reliable enough for this
> > + * purpose?
> > + *
> > + * FIXME: If vga_switcheroo is disabled secondary devices
> > + * never gets initialized. Is this okay? Maybe it is, since
> > + * we can't switch to the secondary GPU anyway.
> > + */
>
> Won't this break the multiple cards with independent outputs case?
Yes, if they don't have a switcheroo handler. I only have experience
with one such machine, which had optimus graphics. My recollection is
that it did have a switcheroo handler, which was only capable of
controlling power to the discrete card.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists