linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50326A3E.9070607@antcom.de>
Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:47:58 +0200
From:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
To:	Kevin Wells <kevin.wells@....com>
CC:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
	"vitalywool@...il.com" <vitalywool@...il.com>,
	"khali@...ux-fr.org" <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	"ben-linux@...ff.org" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Bakki <srinivas.bakki@....com>,
	"aletes.xgr@...il.com" <aletes.xgr@...il.com>,
	"jonsmirl@...il.com" <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arm@...nel.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions

On 08/20/2012 06:26 PM, Kevin Wells wrote:
>>>> This patch for i2c-pnx affects PNX4008 and LPC32xx (and LPC31xx,
>>>> not yet in mainline). Can you please test and double-check the
>>>> manuals of PNX4008 and LPC31xx? I only found this via the manual
>>>> of LPC32xx but assume it's the same for the others, also.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>> Kevin, since the other manuals seem to be not easily available, can
>>> you please check?
>>
>> Yes, would be great if someone at NXP could confirm that PNX actually
>> uses the same IP core for the I2C controller as LPCs do (which is
>> currently assumed by Linux anyway).
> 
> I've never had my hands on a PNX4008 chip at NXP, but I do believe they
> are the same IP. That specific I2C IP was used in a number of NXP/Phillips
> chips besides the PNX4008/LPC32xx. I don't think there are any PNX4008's in
> the wild, and even working in NXP, I can't find any non-marketing reference
> material for that part (including the user manual).

Considering this, it might be a good idea to remove support for PNX4008
(arch/arm/mach-pnx4008/) altogether. It's hard to maintain support for
hardware which isn't available, even at NXP. It would also simplify
maintenance of mach-lpc32xx because the overlap currently makes me
always wonder if the respective changes still work with mach-pnx4008.

Any opposition?

Roland


PS: I just wonder how mach-pnx4008 came into the kernel at all...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/