[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00000139459858e2-456fe4a0-e238-47cc-a057-d87d6a193b6a-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:52:55 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mempolicy: fix a race in shared_policy_replace()
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Kosaki's original patch for this problem was to allocate an sp node and policy
> within shared_policy_replace and initialise it when the lock is reacquired. I
> was not keen on this approach because it partially duplicates sp_alloc(). As
> the paths were sp->lock is taken are not that performance critical this
> patch converts sp->lock to sp->mutex so it can sleep when calling sp_alloc().
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists