[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120820162046.f827f758.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:20:46 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
neilb@...e.de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, michaelc@...wisc.edu,
emunson@...bm.net, sebastian@...akpoint.cc, cl@...ux.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: regression with poll(2)
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:30:59 +0200
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 10:04 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > Can the following patch be tested please? It is reported to fix an fio
> > regression that may be similar to what you are experiencing but has not
> > been picked up yet.
> >
> > -
>
> This seems to help here.
>
> Boot your machine with "mem=768M" or a bit less depending on your setup,
> and try a netperf.
>
> -> before patch :
>
> # netperf
> MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
> localhost.localdomain () port 0 AF_INET
> Recv Send Send
> Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> Size Size Size Time Throughput
> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
>
> 87380 16384 16384 14.00 6.05
>
> -> after patch :
>
> Recv Send Send
> Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> Size Size Size Time Throughput
> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
>
> 87380 16384 16384 10.00 18509.73
"seem to help"? Was previous performance fully restored?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists