[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120821085819.GD28660@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:58:19 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ulrich.weigand@...aro.org" <ulrich.weigand@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 23/31] arm64: Debugging support
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:10:59PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 20 August 2012, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:07:54AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 08:06:07AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > Sorry for the dumb question, but why do you even need PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA
> > > > for 64 bit tasks? I thought the thread pointer is a GPR, or is this just
> > > > for compat tasks?
> > >
> > > The TLS is stored in a co-processor register which is read-only for
> > > userspace.
> >
> > I should elaborate: the register is RW for AArch64 tasks, RO for aarch32
> > tasks (although that doesn't affect the need for the ptrace request).
>
> So can't you just /add/ that register to the GPR regset?
We *could*, but it doesn't feel right to me. The TLS register:
- Can only be manipulated by msr/mrs instructions
- Is not part of the PCS
- Is not accessed explicitly by user applications
- Can not be written via ptrace
so I think it sticks out like a sore thumb if we bundle it up with the GPRs.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists