[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUWg7qEFvAsTMb9OFKmdW7XD4op14Ps2y6PLByZRArjeLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:02:46 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: inux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (call-trace when suspending: PM?)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20120820:
>
> The rr tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>
> The tip tree still has its build failure so I used the version from
> next-20120814.
>
> The workqueues tree gained a conflict against the hid tree.
>
> The drivers-x86 tree still has its build failure so I used the version
> from next-20120817.
>
> The signal tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. I have still
> reverted 3 commits from the signal tree at the request of the arm
> maintainer.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Hi,
I have compiled linux-next (next-20120821) and see the attached
call-trace when suspending.
Suspending did NOT work (Xorg seems to cause it) - machine came back to desktop.
With yesterday's next-20120820 I haven't seen this.
I am not sure what is this causing... PM, x86/sched or even VFS?
Any help for debugging appreciated.
I am on Ubuntu/precise AMD64 and use systemd-v43 as init-system.
Regards,
- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists