linux-kernel - Re: inux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (call-trace when suspending: PM?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:14:36 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: inux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (call-trace when suspending: PM?)

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20120820:
>>>
>>> The rr tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>>>
>>> The tip tree still has its build failure so I used the version from
>>> next-20120814.
>>>
>>> The workqueues tree gained a conflict against the hid tree.
>>>
>>> The drivers-x86 tree still has its build failure so I used the version
>>> from next-20120817.
>>>
>>> The signal tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.  I have still
>>> reverted 3 commits from the signal tree at the request of the arm
>>> maintainer.
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have compiled linux-next (next-20120821) and see the attached
>> call-trace when suspending.
>> Suspending did NOT work (Xorg seems to cause it) - machine came back to desktop.
>>
>> With yesterday's next-20120820 I haven't seen this.
>>
>> I am not sure what is this causing... PM, x86/sched or even VFS?
>> Any help for debugging appreciated.
>>
>> I am on Ubuntu/precise AMD64 and use systemd-v43 as init-system.
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Sedat -
>
> Forgot attachment!
> If you don't succeed - try try try...
>
> - Sedat -

[ CC danvet ]

I have pulled in drm-intel-fixes into my local GIT tree and rebuilt
i915 - this seems to fix the problem.
Daniel any suggestion which patch in d-i-f did it?

[1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-fixes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/