[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBR3JP5_PskQ1xvLg_0RzZfH0qyz1sHeqya+Ok4V-sbrXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:45:48 +0200
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, andi@...stfloor.org,
zheng.z.yan@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: fix SNB-EP CBO and PCU uncore PMU filter management
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 18:22 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> .constraints = snbep_uncore_cbox_constraints,
>> .ops = &snbep_uncore_msr_ops,
>> .format_group = &snbep_uncore_cbox_format_group,
>> + .extra_regs = snbep_uncore_cbo_extra_regs,
>
> The whole cbo vs cbox thing is a bit unfortunate, I know Intel tends to
> forget to type the last letter, but could we be consistent?
>
> Ideally Intel would have called the thing a Cache Coherence Unit or
> somesuch to match the Power Control Unit, But seeing its called C-Box, I
> don't see the point of saving the 1 character and obfuscate the name.
> I've even seen CBO Box used, which is of course completely ridiculous.
Ok, I can resubmit with the word cbox instead.
Still missing is the HA box opcode match/mask support.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists