linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 1/2] Btrfs fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxQiV2iHYQ3NVm=9K=9i6mBo1zwMuvXNrpwnLQwpsRx3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:55:59 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Chris Samuel <chris@...muel.org>
Cc:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>,
	Linux Btrfs List <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 1/2] Btrfs fixes

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Chris Samuel <chris@...muel.org> wrote:
>
> This pull request with a whole heap of btrfs fixes (46 commits) appears
> not to have been merged yet, does anyone know if it was rejected or just
> missed ?

Read my -rc2 release notes.

TL;DR: I rejected big pull requests that didn't convince me. Make a
damn good case for it, or send minimal fixes instead.

I'm tried of these "oops, what we sent you for -rc1 wasn't ready, so
here's a thousand lines of changes" crap.

             Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/