lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:51:36 +0300 From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> CC: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>, Matthew Helsley <matt.helsley@...il.com> Subject: Re: [patch 4/8] fs, exportfs: Add export_encode_inode_fh helper On 08/21/2012 03:29 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: <> > OK. So if you don't mind the fact that there are filesystems with > inotify support but not filehandle support, then I think generating a > filehandle early as you describe would work. I guess it's a little more > memory per watched inode. > For the minority of FSs that do not have a filehandle support it should be easy to generate a generic one, that should work 95% of the time. Are we guaranteed that after the checkpoint restore the version of the Kernel is the same as the one that did the checkpoint? If yes then I don't see any problem. > --b. Cheers Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists