linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] RTC: spear: Fix several error checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1345555932-13737-2-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de>
Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:32:12 +0200
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] RTC: spear: Fix several error checks

There are several comparisons of a unsigned int to less than zero int spear RTC
driver. Such a check will always be true. In all these cases a signed int is
assigned to the unsigned variable, which is checked, before. So the right fix is
to make the checked variable signed as well. In one case the check can be
dropped completely, because all it does it returns 'err' if 'err' is less than
zero, otherwise it returns 0. Since in this particular case 'err' is always
either 0 or less this is the same as just returning 'err'.

The issue has been found using the following coccinelle semantic patch:

//<smpl>
@@
type T;
unsigned T i;
@@
(
*i < 0
|
*i >= 0
)
//</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-spear.c |   12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-spear.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-spear.c
index e278547..bb507d2 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-spear.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-spear.c
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int spear_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 static int spear_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 {
 	struct spear_rtc_config *config = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	unsigned int time, date, err = 0;
+	unsigned int time, date;
 
 	if (tm2bcd(tm) < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -247,11 +247,8 @@ static int spear_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 		(tm->tm_year << YEAR_SHIFT);
 	writel(time, config->ioaddr + TIME_REG);
 	writel(date, config->ioaddr + DATE_REG);
-	err = is_write_complete(config);
-	if (err < 0)
-		return err;
 
-	return 0;
+	return is_write_complete(config);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -295,7 +292,8 @@ static int spear_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alm)
 static int spear_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alm)
 {
 	struct spear_rtc_config *config = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	unsigned int time, date, err = 0;
+	unsigned int time, date;
+	int err;
 
 	if (tm2bcd(&alm->time) < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -357,7 +355,7 @@ static int __devinit spear_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct resource *res;
 	struct spear_rtc_config *config;
-	unsigned int status = 0;
+	int status = 0;
 	int irq;
 
 	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/