[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5033A790.2060004@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:21:52 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [discussion]sched: a rough proposal to enable power saving in
scheduler
>>> A modern kernel better know what state the system is in: on
>>> battery or on AC power.
>>
>> That's a fundamentally uninteresting thing for the kernel to
>> know about. [...]
>
> I disagree.
and I'll agree with Matthew and disagree with you ;-)
>
>> [...] AC/battery is just not an important power management
>> policy input when compared to various other things.
>
> Such as?
>
> The thing is, when I use Linux on a laptop then AC/battery is
> *the* main policy input.
I think you're wrong there.
First of all, not the whole world is a laptop.
Phones and servers are very different than laptops in this sense.
In a phone, when you're charging, you want to be EXTRA power efficient in many ways
(since charging creates heat, and that heat will take away your thermal budget).
In a datacenter, you're either on AC or DC all the time, and power efficiency still matters.
And even on a laptop.. heat production matters even when on AC... laptops are more and more like phones
that way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists