[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120821152918.GM2582@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:29:18 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<joro@...tes.org>, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] x86, msi: Introduce x86_msi.compose_msi_msg
call-back
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:42:57AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:40:07AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > The VT-d implementation uses it. This function is used to create the MSI
> > message for PCI devices and the HPET. When it is called for the HPET the
> > pdev parameter is NULL and hpet_id is valid.
>
> Perhaps then a more generic term? 'void *platform_priv' ?
Doesn't work this way here. The Intel code detects on pdev==NULL that it
needs to use hpet_id. What could work is to split the code-paths between
pci_dev msi composition and the one for hpet.
But that approach has the downside of code duplication to some degree.
Regards,
Joerg
--
AMD Operating System Research Center
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists