linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] input: ab8500-ponkey: Rely on MFD core to convert IRQs to virtual

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120821164244.GA4672@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:42:44 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
	arnd@...db.de, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] input: ab8500-ponkey: Rely on MFD core to convert
 IRQs to virtual

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:23:29AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:31:08AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > There was a plan to place ab8500_irq_get_virq() calls in each AB8500
> > > child device prior to requesting an IRQ, but as we're no longer using
> > > Device Tree to collect our IRQ numbers, it's actually better to allow
> > > the core to do this during device registration time. So the IRQ number
> > > we pull from its resource has already been converted to a virtual IRQ.
> > >
> > > CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> > > CC: linux-input@...r.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > 
> > This is looking good, I guess you need all patches to go in at the
> > same time so Dmitry's ACK is required.
> 
> Yep, just waiting for that now.

Sorry for the delay. Yes, this shoudl be fine, but since it is
essentially a revert of the original patch it should be pushed in as
such.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/