linux-kernel - Re: inux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (call-trace when suspending: PM?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+icZUXGpTMgP7BX-RWHK=pKMu3x9z7UnHiDELDg94esW24FvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:20:35 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: inux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (call-trace when suspending: PM?)

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Changes since 20120820:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The rr tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The tip tree still has its build failure so I used the version from
>>>>>>> next-20120814.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The workqueues tree gained a conflict against the hid tree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The drivers-x86 tree still has its build failure so I used the version
>>>>>>> from next-20120817.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The signal tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.  I have still
>>>>>>> reverted 3 commits from the signal tree at the request of the arm
>>>>>>> maintainer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have compiled linux-next (next-20120821) and see the attached
>>>>>> call-trace when suspending.
>>>>>> Suspending did NOT work (Xorg seems to cause it) - machine came back to desktop.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With yesterday's next-20120820 I haven't seen this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not sure what is this causing... PM, x86/sched or even VFS?
>>>>>> Any help for debugging appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am on Ubuntu/precise AMD64 and use systemd-v43 as init-system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> - Sedat -
>>>>>
>>>>> Forgot attachment!
>>>>> If you don't succeed - try try try...
>>>>>
>>>>> - Sedat -
>>>>
>>>> [ CC danvet ]
>>>>
>>>> I have pulled in drm-intel-fixes into my local GIT tree and rebuilt
>>>> i915 - this seems to fix the problem.
>>>> Daniel any suggestion which patch in d-i-f did it?
>>>
>>> Without the backtrace it's kinda hard to tell ... Also, if you can
>>> dump a git log of the commits from -fixes that you don't yet have.
>>> -Daniel
>>>
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> $ git log --oneline v3.6.0-rc2-next20120821-1-iniza-generic..drm-intel-fixes
>> 1ee9ae3 drm/i915: use hsw rps tuning values everywhere on gen6+
>> f1a2f5b drm/i915: fall back to bit-banging if GMBUS fails in CRT EDID reads
>> 4eab813 drm/i915: extract connector update from intel_ddc_get_modes() for reuse
>> a843af1 drm/i915: fix hsw uncached pte
>> b6c7488 drm/i915/contexts: fix list corruption
>> 38ab8a2 drm/i915: fix EDID memory leak in SDVO
>>
>> Looks like "1ee9ae3 drm/i915: use hsw rps tuning values everywhere on
>> gen6+" has PM fixes for i915.
>>
>> I tried with only that patch on top of today's linux-next - and I can
>> suspend/resume again!
>
> Well, this is slightly shocking - this patch /should/ only optimize
> power consumption, it should in now way fix suspend/resume (i.e. it
> doesn't even apply any h/w workaround). Do you have any more details
> what's going wrong here (logs, ...)?
>

Forgot to CC you on my 1st emails.
[2] has the call-trace I have seen.

- Sedat -

[2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=134554704504603&w=2

> Thanks, Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> daniel.vetter@...ll.ch - +41 (0) 79 364 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/