linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 16/31] arm64: ELF definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201208211453.18583.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:53:16 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/31] arm64: ELF definitions

On Tuesday 21 August 2012 14:27:31 Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 07:17:19PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > But I can see on x86 that it always reports x86_64 even if the task is
> > > x86_32.
> > 
> > Really?
> > 
> > $ uname -m
> > x86_64
> > $ linux32 uname -m
> > i686
> > $
> 
> Well, you set the personality explicitly with linux32. What I tested was
> with an x86_32 uname called directly (without linux32) and even though
> the ELF was a 32-bit one, it was reporting x86_64. In this AArch64
> patch, a compat task was automatically setting the linux32 personality
> (which x86 does not do).

i don't think any arch does this.

$ uname -m
ppc64
$ linux32 uname -m
ppc

$ uname -m
sparc64
$ linux32 uname -m
sparc

$ uname -m
x86_64
$ linux32 uname -m
i686

$ uname -m
s390x
$ linux32 uname -m
s390

> Arnd's point is that the ELF file should not affect the personality and
> hence the uname value. This should only be done by an explicit call to
> sys_personality().

correct.  if someone really wants to launch their whole userland with the 
adjusted personality, they could always boot the kernel with:
	init=/usr/bin/linux32 /sbin/init
but the kernel shouldn't be doing this automatically.
-mike

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)