linux-kernel - Re: [tip:timers/core] timer: Implement TIMER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:26:51 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/core] timer: Implement TIMER_IRQSAFE

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:43:07AM -0700, tip-bot for Tejun Heo wrote:
> Commit-ID:  c5f66e99b7cb091e3d51ae8e8156892e8feb7fa3
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/c5f66e99b7cb091e3d51ae8e8156892e8feb7fa3
> Author:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> AuthorDate: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:10:28 -0700
> Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> CommitDate: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:28:31 +0200
> 
> timer: Implement TIMER_IRQSAFE
> 
> Timer internals are protected with irq-safe locks but timer execution
> isn't, so a timer being dequeued for execution and its execution
> aren't atomic against IRQs.  This makes it impossible to wait for its
> completion from IRQ handlers and difficult to shoot down a timer from
> IRQ handlers.
> 
> This issue caused some issues for delayed_work interface.  Because
> there's no way to reliably shoot down delayed_work->timer from IRQ
> handlers, __cancel_delayed_work() can't share the logic to steal the
> target delayed_work with cancel_delayed_work_sync(), and can only
> steal delayed_works which are on queued on timer.  Similarly, the
> pending mod_delayed_work() can't be used from IRQ handlers.
> 
> This patch adds a new timer flag TIMER_IRQSAFE, which makes the timer
> to be executed without enabling IRQ after dequeueing such that its
> dequeueing and execution are atomic against IRQ handlers.
> 
> This makes it safe to wait for the timer's completion from IRQ
> handlers, for example, using del_timer_sync().  It can never be
> executing on the local CPU and if executing on other CPUs it won't be
> interrupted until done.
> 
> This will enable simplifying delayed_work cancel/mod interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
> Cc: peterz@...radead.org
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344449428-24962-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

Will pull into wq/for-3.7 and put delay_work changes on top.  If
there's any objection, please scream.

Thanks a lot.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/