linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 04/11] x86/microcode_core_early.c: Define interfaces for early load ucode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3E5A0FA7E9CA944F9D5414FEC6C712200778846C@ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:05:30 +0000
From:	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
	Tigran Aivazian <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/11] x86/microcode_core_early.c: Define interfaces for
 early load ucode

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:bp@...64.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 1:20 PM
> To: H. Peter Anvin
> Cc: Yu, Fenghua; Henrique de Moraes Holschuh; Ingo Molnar; Thomas
> Gleixner; Mallick, Asit K; Tigran Aivazian; Andreas Herrmann; Borislav
> Petkov; linux-kernel; x86
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] x86/microcode_core_early.c: Define
> interfaces for early load ucode
> 
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:08:49PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 08/20/2012 07:06 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > >
> > > Or,
> > >
> > > in case we want to supply more vendor-specific stuff early at boot,
> we
> > > could do:
> > >
> > > kernel/x86/<vendor>/microcode...
> > > 		|-> bios_overrides
> > > 		|-> ...
> > >
> > > and have this layout extensible from the beginning...
> > >
> > Does that make sense, though?
> 
> Only time will tell. I was simply saying that we should leave ourselves
> the door opened, should we need functionality like that in the future.
> 
> > I'm a bit concerned about having multiple files named microcode.bin
> by
> > default; the pathname isn't as sticky as the filename when people
> move
> > things around...
> 
> Ok, I see.
> 
> How about the following scheme then:
> 
> kernel/x86/<vendor>-microcode.bin
> kernel/x86/<vendor>-bios-overrides.blob
> ...
> 
> ?
> 
> All I'm saying is maybe we should impose some sanity rules now before
> people go crazy with this and things get out of hands...

We might name the cpio directory as:

kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin
kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin
kernel/x86/acpi/...
etc.

This is expendable for the future usage.
 
Plus I will add a doc on the cpio directory, supported directory names and how to add new stuffs in the directory.

Thanks.

-Fenghua


Thanks.

-Fenghua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/