[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120821070515.GA1657@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:05:15 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
neilb@...e.de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, michaelc@...wisc.edu,
emunson@...bm.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, sebastian@...akpoint.cc,
cl@...ux.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: regression with poll(2)
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:54:59AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > > I've retested several times and confirmed that this change leads to the
> > > breakage, and also confirmed that reverting it on top of -rc1 also fixes
> > > the problem.
> > >
> > > I've also added some additional instrumentation to my code and confirmed
> > > that the process is blocking on poll(2) while netstat is reporting
> > > data available on the socket.
> > >
> > > What can I do to help track this down?
> > >
> >
> > Can the following patch be tested please? It is reported to fix an fio
> > regression that may be similar to what you are experiencing but has not
> > been picked up yet.
>
> This patch appears to resolve things for me as well, at least after a
> couple of passes. I'll let you know if I see any further problems come up
> with more testing.
>
Thanks very much Sage.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists