[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50347037.3040209@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:37:59 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
CC: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mmu_notifier: fix inconsistent memory between secondary
MMU and host
On 08/22/2012 12:12 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> On 08/21/2012 11:06 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>>>
>>> The KSM usage of it looks safe because it will only establish readonly
>>> ptes with it.
>>
>> Hmm, in KSM code, i found this code in replace_page:
>>
>> set_pte_at_notify(mm, addr, ptep, mk_pte(kpage, vma->vm_page_prot));
>>
>> It is possible to establish a writable pte, no?
>
> No: we only do KSM in private vmas (!VM_SHARED), and because of the
> need to CopyOnWrite in those, vm_page_prot excludes write permission:
> write permission has to be added on COW fault.
After read the code carefully, yes, you are right. Thank you very much
for your explanation, Hugh! :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists