[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A874F61F95741C4A9BA573A70FE3998F41EF0BFF@DQHE02.ent.ti.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 05:46:21 +0000
From: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@...com>
To: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] leds-lp5523: set the brightness to 0 forcely on
removing the driver
> Hmmm, I think we still should use cancel_work() here based on your
> idea. Please find the patch from Tejun and add him to this loop
> [PATCH 4/6] workqueue: deprecate flush[_delayed]_work_sync()
> ---
> Before this patchset,
>
> flush_work()
>
> flush the last queued instance of the work item. If it got
> queued on multple CPUs, it only considers the last queued
> instance. The work item could still be executing on other
> CPUs and the flush might become noop if there are competing
> queueing operation on another CPU.
>
> flush_work_sync()
>
> flush_work() + wait for executing instances on all CPUs. The
> flush_work() part may still become noop if there's competing
> queueing operation.
>
> cancel_work()
>
> Dequeue the work item if it's pending. Doesn't care about
> whether it's executing or not.
>
> cancel_work_sync()
>
> cancel_work() + flush_work_sync().
>
>
> After this patchset,
>
> flush_work()
>
> flush the work item. Any queueing happened previously is
> guaranteed to have finished execution on return. If no
> further queueing happened after flush started, the work item
> is guaranteed to be idle on return.
>
> cancel_work()
>
> Same as before.
>
> cancel_work_sync()
>
> cancel_work() followed by flush_work(). The same semantics as
> del_timer_sync().
> ---
>
> cancel_work_sync() won't execute the work item at all just cancel
> them, but flush will execute them and return.
>
Thanks a lot for the updates!
Then, I think flush_work() should be used for executing remaining brightness work
rather than cancel_work_sync().
Best Regards,
Milo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists