linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] virtio_balloon: introduce migration primitives to balloon pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120822003723.GL9027@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2012 03:37:24 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] virtio_balloon: introduce migration primitives to
 balloon pages

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:01:37PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:28:51 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:16:51PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > I was thinking of exactly that page->mapping == balloon_mapping check. As I
> > > do not know how many active balloon drivers there might be I cannot guess
> > > in advance how much of a scalability problem it will be.
> > 
> > Not at all sure multiple drivers are worth supporting, but multiple
> > *devices* is I think worth supporting, if for no other reason than that
> > they can work today. For that, we need a device pointer which Rafael
> > wants to put into the mapping, this means multiple balloon mappings.
> 
> Rafael, please make sure that the balloon driver fails on the second and
> subsequent balloon devices.
> 
> Michael, we only allow multiple balloon devices because it fell out of
> the implementation.  If it causes us even the slightest issue, we should
> not support it.  It's not a sensible setup.
> 
> Cheers,
> Rusty.

Looks like latest revision does it using a flag which seems cleaner,
so I think the point is moot.

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/