[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120822152918.3e59616e@feng-i7>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:29:18 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
Cc: <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jean Delvare (PC drivers, core)" <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: i2c-eg20t: regression since i2c_add_numbered_adapter change
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:30:35 +0200
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just noticed the 3.4 linux kernel fails to sucessfully probe the i2c-eg20t
> driver. I returns with EBUSY error. It worked on the 3.0 kernel. To my view it
> is caused the commit 07e8a51ff68353e01d795cceafbac9f54c49132b ( i2c-eg20t: use
> i2c_add_numbered_adapter to get a fixed bus number).
> The reason it actually fails is that the i2c-isch driver is registered
> beforehand which gets bus number 0. But this one is the bus number the eg20t
> driver wants to register.
Make sense.
> A possibility is that if i2c_add_numbered_adapter failed with EBUSY just use
> i2c_add_adapter to get at least the driver working, but with a non-fixed bus
> number. Opinions?
Or can we give it a fixed offset, like let the i2c_eg20t controller bus number
start with 4? I don't expect there will be more than 4 other i2c controllers
on EG20T compatible platforms.
Thanks,
Feng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists