linux-kernel - Re: apparent regressions from TLB range flushing page set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:39:16 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...e.com>
To:	<alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc:	<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: apparent regressions from TLB range flushing page set

>>> Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> 08/22/12 5:24 AM >>>
>On 08/20/2012 10:12 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>I was thought you have 'Agreed' for xen part code. :)

I had agreed to it being done the right way, and I had pointed out the
problem once. I can't say for sure that I looked at the most recent rev
closely enough to spot the issue still being unfixed.

>> For one, while TLB_FLUSH_ALL gets passed as 'end' argument to
>> flush_tlb_others(), the Xen code was made to check its 'start'
>> parameter.
>
>Do you mean need the following change? --untested.

Yes. I'd question though whether for that special case it shouldn't be
start _and_ end to get passed the special value.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/