[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1208221144520.25605@frira.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:53:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
To: Dan Luedtke <mail@...rl.de>
cc: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lanyfs@...relist.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Introducing Lanyard Filesystem
On Sunday 2012-08-19 15:34, Dan Luedtke wrote:
>I analyzed about 600k file stored on various removable storage devices.
>80 volunteers sent in data about their devices, generated by a program
>(windows) and scripts (linux, bsd, osx) I wrote for that purpose. The
>data shows that people use more complex filesystems as soon as they are
>confronted with problems (mostly the 4GB limit). After that they have
>problems getting their data accessed by other systems. I derived from
>that, that we need a filesystem that is so simple that even unpopular
>operating systems can implement it without having their business plan
>explode.
Those unpopular OSes do not care about *any other* filesystem at all.
The only way to get a filesystem accepted is by making an ISO standard
out of it - or something in that direction - *and* use it thoroughly
in products, like UDF. Even then, support for new revisions of UDF
has been rather slow-coming.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists