[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5034F9510200007800096E97@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:22:57 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Alex Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: apparent regressions from TLB range flushing page set
>>> On 22.08.12 at 10:54, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 03:39 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>>>>> Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> 08/22/12 5:24 AM >>>
>>> On 08/20/2012 10:12 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> I was thought you have 'Agreed' for xen part code. :)
>>
>> I had agreed to it being done the right way, and I had pointed out the
>> problem once. I can't say for sure that I looked at the most recent rev
>> closely enough to spot the issue still being unfixed.
>>
>>>> For one, while TLB_FLUSH_ALL gets passed as 'end' argument to
>>>> flush_tlb_others(), the Xen code was made to check its 'start'
>>>> parameter.
>>>
>>> Do you mean need the following change? --untested.
>>
>> Yes. I'd question though whether for that special case it shouldn't be
>> start _and_ end to get passed the special value.
>
>
> Actually the special value is already there in old code.
> so, what's your meaning of the question?
I'm saying that I'd rather see
#define flush_tlb_mm(mm) flush_tlb_mm_range(mm, TLB_FLUSH_ALL, TLB_FLUSH_ALL, 0UL)
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists