linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5034E8A5.2060701@linutronix.de>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:11:49 +0200
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	stan_shebs@...tor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step

On 08/22/2012 04:03 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/20, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>
>> The arch specific implementation behaves like user_enable_single_step()
>> except that it does not disable single stepping if it was already
>> enabled.
>
> Sebastian, we have other uprobes patches in flight, I'll returns to
> this after we push them.
>
> As I said, personally I mostly agree with this change... but may be
> I'll try to convince you to make v4 ;)

Ehm. Is there anything I missed to do? Or are you speculating on
changes which will clash with these here?

>
> Oleg.
>

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/