[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120822144133.GE16283@8bytes.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:41:33 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] x86, msi: Introduce x86_msi.compose_msi_msg
call-back
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:42:57AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:40:07AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:08:44AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:56:03PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > > This call-back points to the right function for initializing
> > > > the msi_msg structure.
> > >
> > > What is the 'hpet_id' purpose in this?
> >
> > The VT-d implementation uses it. This function is used to create the MSI
> > message for PCI devices and the HPET. When it is called for the HPET the
> > pdev parameter is NULL and hpet_id is valid.
>
> Perhaps then a more generic term? 'void *platform_priv' ?
Okay, I looked into the code a bit more and the best solution is to
remove the pdev and hpet_id parameters completly from the
msi_compose_msg path. The only user of these parameters is the Intel
interrupt remapping code which can also set the source-ids in the
irq-alloc path. But this is a larger effort which is best done in a
seperate patch-set.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists