[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1345653510-22000-1-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:38:29 -0500
From: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
adobriyan@...il.com, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] fs/proc: Move kfree outside pde_unload_lock
This moves a kfree outside a spinlock to help scaling on larger (512 core)
systems.
I ran a simple test which just reads from /proc/cpuinfo.
Lower is better, as you can see the worst case scenario is improved.
baseline moved kfree
tasks read-sec read-sec
1 0.0141 0.0141
2 0.0140 0.0140
4 0.0140 0.0141
8 0.0145 0.0145
16 0.0553 0.0548
32 0.1688 0.1622
64 0.5017 0.3856
128 1.7005 0.9710
256 5.2513 2.6519
512 8.0529 6.2976
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
---
fs/proc/inode.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c
index 7ac817b..bf36266 100644
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@ -403,9 +403,9 @@ static int proc_reg_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
release = pde->proc_fops->release;
if (pdeo) {
list_del(&pdeo->lh);
- kfree(pdeo);
}
spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
+ kfree(pdeo);
if (release)
rv = release(inode, file);
--
1.6.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists